Friday, May 23, 2008

How The American Economic Association Allocated Its Dollars

The S&P 500 index gained 5.49 percent in 2007, while the portfolio of AEA gained 10.2 percent. Two things to take notice here:

  1. The AEA's portfolio is composed of all vanguard funds;
  2. The most significant change to the portfolio after April 2007 is a 20% shift from bond to foreign stocks.
Though the article didn't tell you what funds exactly the AEA is holding its assets in, you can easily look them up from vanguard's website based on the general funds' names given in the article. And you can also look up the corresponding ETFs' here.

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Book Review: The Intelligent Asset Allocator

There are two kinds of investors, be they large or small: those who don't know where the market is headed, and those who don't know that they don't know. Then again, there is actually a third type of investor--the investment professional, who indeed knows that he or she doesn't know, but whose livelihood depends upon appearing to know.
- William Bernstein, "The Intelligent Asset Allocator"

I used to be the second type. When I first started investing back in my second year in college, stocks were the only investment that I knew and stock price was the only thing I considered. Since I had only $600 to play, I wanted to buy a stock with price below $5.00. My logic was that it would be easy for $5.00 to jump to $10.00. Plus, how much further a $5.00 stock can drop? Though by luck, the stock price indeed jumped close to $10.00 after 6 months, and I indeed sold them to secure the profits, there were two fatal flaws in my thinking:
  1. Diversification never occurred to me.
  2. I was gambling, not investing, for the first characteristics of investing is to aim for the long term.
These two points are well addressed in the book "The Intelligent Asset Allocator," not only Author Bernstein tells you why diversification is vital by showing statistics, which was convincing to me, a math major, he also make suggestions on how to do it and what one should consider when doing it. Not only he points out the danger of the gambler's thinking, he goes further by suggesting that even thinking in terms of "recency" should be avoided. The book held in my hands was published in the year 2000, 3 year earlier than the time I made my first trade. Yeah, I could have read it if I were to do some research before jumping into the market. But it is not too late to read it now, and here are some key ideas from the book that got me re-think about my current asset allocation for my Roth IRA: (I haven't opened the IRA account yet due to the liquidity of my money. Patience is indeed a virtue.)
  1. Invest on index. (Graham made the same argument in his famous book "The Intelligent Investor")
  2. Dividing portfolio between uncorrelated assets. (This is not something that I considered in my asset allocation, for example, I don't have real estate or precious metal funds in my portfolio.)
  3. Favor short-term bonds (of six months to five years) as your "risk diluting" asset, rather than long-term bonds. (This is something I considered.)
  4. Beware of recency, and do not be overly impressed with asset class returns over periods of less than two or three decades. (This got me re-think about Dodge & Cox funds)
  5. never increase your allocation to an asset because of economic or political events or because you have heard an analyst make a convincing case for doing so. (Once you are settled on a target, then you are set. I'm glad that I'm not settled yet, and so far, the only investment vehicle I have is my 401k, which I don't think significant changes needs to be made.)
  6. When allocating your money, think all your accounts as a whole. (I had this idea before as well since the final goal is to measure how well your overall net wealth is doing, but I realized it would hard to re-balance such an overall portfolio as well. Mr. Bernstein recognized this as well. I guess the only solution is to give it a try and see how well it goes.)
Stay tune for my updated asset allocation.

Friday, February 22, 2008

Asset Allocation for My Roth IRA

After I'm done with asset allocation for my 401k, I move on to Roth IRA. I decide to max out the its contribution limit ($5,000 for year 2008) as well. Since I'm not limited to pick from a few costly but mediocre performing funds like in the case of my company 401k, and my 401k is really a conservative approach, I can afford to be more aggressive for my Roth IRA. I set the mix target via the following aggressive-conservative-conservative levels:

1st Level
Target

U.S. Stocks 50%

Foreign Stocks 40%

Bonds/Cash/Others 10%

Total 100%

2nd level Giant/Large 80%

Mid 20%

Small/Micro 0%

Total 100%

3nd level_non foreign Giant/Large 60%

Mid 20%

Small/Micro 0%

Total 80%

Like my 401k, when I do my contribution allocation, I will follow the above target in the level-ordering fashion because I think the first level has most dominant power on my portfolio. To avoid things going wild, I have to hedge the risk involved in the second and third level significantly by allowing only 20% exposure to the mid/small caps.

Thursday, February 21, 2008

Asset Allocation for My 401K Account

Deciding an asset mix has to do with one's tolerance of risk.

I've decided to max out my company traditional 401k for the year 2008. This means most of the money I'm going to put to investment will go to this account this year. Surely I want to play safe. But I don't want to have a bland year either. So I came up with a three level mix of which the first two levels being conservative and the third level being aggressive.

1st Level
Target

U.S. Stocks 65%

Foreign Stocks 25%

Bonds/Cash/Others 10%

Total 100%

Though I think the foreign market will perform better in the coming and next 3-5 years. Our recent market turbulence showed that U.S. market still leads the rest of the world. So I settle 25% on foreign stocks. Next, I set a mix target regarding to the market caps:

2nd level Giant/Large 55%

Mid 25%

Small/Micro 10%

Total 90%

Mid and small caps usually generate more returns over time but have more fluctuations and risks as well. With 35% in mid and small caps, plus a 10% in bond and cash, I feel pretty comfortable in terms of both risks and potential returns. Next, I want to make sure the non-foreign part has a reasonable mix regarding to the market caps as well:

3nd level_non-foreign
Giant/Large 35%

Mid 20%

Small/Micro 10%

Total 65%

As you can see, the proportion of Giant/Large VS. Mid/Small/Micro is close to 1:1. This will hedge the safety net built by the first two levels by increasing more exposure to mid and small companies. When I do my portfolio allocation, I make sure to follow the level ordering of these three targets. This way, it will ensure a conservative solid backbone and the potential to bigger returns as well.

Note: I distinguish Giant and Large (Small and Micro) because Morningstar report this way and I use the data published on their website to conduct portfolio allocation. The actual difference between Giant and Large (Small and Micro) matters little to me.

blogger templates | Make Money Online